simrot.blogg.se

The USB Type C connector has been designed to provide a number of advantages when compared to previous generations. In these configurations no damage will result to the systems, but proper power and data transfer will occur upon the systems negotiating common communications and power configurations. It should be noted that USB standards also allow for transmitting legacy (pre-USB 3.2 Gen 2) USB signaling configurations using USB Type C connectors and cables. This implementation benefits from the wide availability and inexpensive cost of USB Type C connectors and cables, but puts the user at risk of connecting the non-conforming proprietary system to a system conforming to the USB 3.2 standard and damaging one or both of the systems. In a similar fashion a USB Type C connector can be used to transmit and receive signals not conforming to USB signal standards. A product designer can implement such a configuration using the USB 3.2 signal standard and their own proprietary connectors, if they want to keep the system isolated from other systems or to ensure that proprietary hardware is being used. While most system designers will choose to communicate USB 3.2 signals through USB Type C connectors and cables, it is possible to transmit and receive USB 3.2 Gen 1, Gen 2, and Gen 2x2 compliant signals through a connector which does not conform to the USB Type C specification. The USB Type C standard defines only the physical connector while the USB 3.2 standard applies only to the electrical signal. Misconceptions Between USB Type C and USB 3.2Ĭonfusion often arises when discussing the relationship between USB Type C connectors and say for example USB 3.2 Gen 2 (previously USB 3.1 Gen 2). *Previously known as USB 3.1 Gen 1 and USB 3.0